‘If wishes were horses then beggars would ride.’ Countless times my mother repeated this old chestnut to me in my (now long departed) youth. The point, of course, was to teach my sister and I to deal with the here and now- not expend energy on the wish it were otherwise. My mother is a child of the Great Depression. She learned and never forgot its hard lessons and wanted to communicate them to her progeny. As much as I sought to ignore these lessons, mercifully some of what she had to say stuck.

Times being the way they are, those of us who intend to come out of this relatively whole have had to become coldly pragmatic, with strategies that are more in line with what we need to do to get through the month than positioning ourselves to take advantage of perceived opportunities. Perception can, of course, be the mis-perceived and wished-for, occluding good judgement and clear thinking. We are having to cope with one particularly overwhelming mis-perception on nearly a daily basis.

Specifically, with everyone scrambling to stay afloat financially there is a perception that extraordinary items of personal property will be dumped in great numbers on the market, and available for pennies on the dollar. This kind of thing happened in the Great Depression, didn’t it?, where the Duveens and the Wildensteins of the world were able to acquire wonderful pieces of fine and decorative artwork from the newly impoverished.

In the art market, as in most other things, a consideration of the then and now, with so many variables, renders any comparison specious. In the art market, the rare and wonderful in existence now is, to a great extent, what was in existence then and, have you noticed? there are more people, and more moneyed people in more places now than there were then. Consequently, with that which has always been in finite supply, when blended with the greater numbers who seek the rare and beautiful, becomes as a consequence even rarer. A bargain is always seen by those in the art market channels (read ‘an art and antiques dealer’) and is snapped up before it ever sees the light of day. Think about it- with the numbers of public disbursal sales that have occurred in recent weeks, what was on offer ranged from the mediocre that was, shall we say, ‘shoppy’, to the somewhat better than mediocre. By this I mean, what was for sale was what no one really had wanted anyway. The best goods had already been sold off or placed with another dealer. Bargain prices? If something sells at auction for its appropriate value, even if it is less than the previous owner was asking for it, that doesn’t represent therefore a bargain purchase: it merely indicates that it was formerly overpriced.

Unfortunately, there seems to be this pervasive notion that bargains are to be had, even though none are forthcoming. Consequently prospective buyers are in fact missing out on what bargains there really are. To wit, an art and antiques dealer might now accept a little less for good material than he would otherwise. Note, however, that I said ‘good’ material, because the great material the dealer will oftentimes already have sold off, or will hold on to. Or, for instance, he might be willing to broker a sale on a commission basis rather than purchase an item outright and hold it for resale. That, of course, is quite a bit of what Duveen did during the Great Depression, and his buyers finally cottoned on to the fact that Duveen was still the go-to guy for fabulous artwork. That, in a nutshell, is the message. Now, as then, it is the art and antiques dealer that will have, and to whom one should apply, for the ‘bargain.’


That the trade is slow is not news to anyone in the art market, be you merchant of any stripe, from wall art to English antiques. The disbursal sales we’ve attended make that clear. With quite a bit of material at the final clear outs unsold, or selling at low estimates you have gathered, therefore, that with limited commissions earned, the auction business is still tough sledding, too.

Although material more within the canon, both fine and decorative art, composes the Chappell & McCullar oeuvre, we are still sufficiently close to the world of contemporary material to gain a sense of the weather there. Frankly, while it may be shall we say inclement here, it is the mother of all storms there. When a body thinks about it, it isn’t terribly surprising. As with the 18th century material that forms our corpus, fine quality 20th century material is pretty rare. As Poillerat, Printz and Nakashima pieces were not mass produced, these one-offs have often commanded more at auction than a period piece of similar outline with an illustrious provenance and attributable to a vaunted maker. Moreover, with a limited supply and, for a while, frenetic demand, dealers oftentimes began to offer what was, frankly, kitsch of the Murano glass and Heywood Wakefield furniture variety. Assuming you wanted to turn your living space into a 1950’s TV room, this is, then, okay. But the question was inevitably begged- why purchase 1950’s kitsch, if that is your perverse desire, when you can buy the same thing- new- for less money. The penny dropped for me a year or so ago when a young man looked at a piece of midcentury design in our own galleries, and asked a question I couldn’t answer. ‘Why,’ he queried, ‘would a person buy a worn-out Eames chair when the new one is exactly the same, made by the same maker?’ Good question. Knoll and Herman Miller pieces from retail and online outlets like Design Within Reach are low-anxiety purveyors of 20th century design, and on a budget.

One of the better dealers in mid-century furniture, whose handled material is in the Poillerat, Printz and Nakashima caliber, told us several years ago how difficult it was to sell his stock profitably, as the auction houses were the market makers and, with their databases of sold lots as accessible as their online catalogs, everyone in the world could see what a dealer had paid for their stock. Indeed, a fair old amount of the record setting auction prices were set by, wait for it, dealers buying for stock. Not surprising, a fair old bit of that record setting material is now finding its way back into the auction galleries. Any new records in the offing on the second go-around? No breath-holding, please.


What is one to make of the fate of the antiques trade? We’ve just come from previewing the sell-out of Ed Hardy San Francisco, with the auction scheduled for next Tuesday. We’ve also received a letter in the mail from Dillingham and Company, with Gaylord Dillingham himself notifying everyone that he will cease trading as of the end of May. That these two particularly well-known and high profile dealers have decided to vacate the business at the same time points to how deeply in the doldrums the antiques and fine art trade must be.

Ed Hardy, with his landmark villa-like showroom premises in the midst of the San Francisco design district, has been a featured destination for interior designers particularly on the West Coast. With frequent functions hosting, for instance, book launches, the most recent being Stephen Salny’s opus on Michael Taylor, Ed is intimately associated with interior design at the highest levels: no AD 100 designer on the coast has not done significant business with him. Responsive to trends in design, Ed has offered in recent years more 20th century material, with his present stock in trade including offerings from Fornasetti and Gio Ponti.

What Ed is to the designer, Gay Dillingham is to the private collector. I have never seen a piece of furniture that Gay has offered that was not of exquisite quality, both in terms of design, color, and condition. If anyone has an eye, it’s Gay. Not surprising, he’s a tremendously respected figure in the antiques trade internationally. It is seldom that any press publications about the Winter Antiques Show, for instance, do not contain extensive quotes from Gay. Although Kentshire and Hyde Park Antiques have a larger stock, no one, in my opinion, has a better, more precisely curated stock of 18th  and early 19th century British and European furniture than Gay.

At the highest end of the trade, these two soon to be former antiques dealers compose the entire spectrum of the business, from interior designer to private collector. Although this blog entry can certainly be read as an encomium to Ed Hardy and Gaylord Dillingham, it is also a mayday for the trade. When is this going to end?


Those of you who read my ‘tweets’ on celebs at the Los Angeles Antiques Show know that it was well attended by the glitterati. Zach Braff, Chris Klein, Eva Mendes, and Jimmy Kimmel were, to my knowledge, first time attendees. A couple of significant factors- all of them are young and spent a considerable amount of time at the show. What I mean to say is, they were seriously looking. If they didn’t buy, at least gauged by the amount of time they spent at the show, they must have been intrigued by what they saw.

And why would they not? The show looked terrific, with the entry into the show itself composed of a hall of mirrors, all of different shapes and periods loaned by exhibitors, set the tone for the wonderful offerings within. The show entry was staged by our good friend and excellent interior designer, Lizzie Dinkel.

As well as younger show visitors, a new wave of LA designers was also there, including Oliver Furth, Trevor Goff, Thierry Marchand, and the usual but none the less welcome show stalwarts Joe Nye, Madeline Stuart, Kathryn Ireland, and Martin Lawrence-Bullard. What will Joe think of my characterizing him as a ‘stalwart’? It sounds a more fitting description for a parking bollard than a talented interior designer who’s just completed a room for the Kip’s Bay Showhouse in New York. Joe does read this blog, as one of my 20 or so devoted readers, so doubtless I will receive his redress in the fullness of time.

The miracle, though? That the show happened at all, with dealers jittery and unwilling to commit to participate until the very last minute. Kudos to show chairs Laurent Rebuffel of Habite in Los Angeles  and Robert Willson of Downtown who pushed and prodded, and got a show put together that was at least as good as any in its 14-year history. Rough edges? As a concomitant portion of the overall show miracle, whatever difficulties existed were only marginally apparent to Keith and me- and thankfully invisible to show visitors.


Sort of an abbreviated blog entry today, as the Wi-Fi connection at the show is a bit dodgy, reducing thereby my typically loquacious entry. Lucky you, my twenty devoted readers. I’ll wax eloquent later next week.

While show attendance has been good, what’s not surprising is the pervasive caution amongst potential buyers. Mind you, we’re gratified to find the numbers of people, mostly interior designers, who’ve come into the show just to see us. All of them have said the same thing- projects are on hold, or slowed to a snail’s pace- even projects very near completion.

What we are hearing too, is that the buyers will be back closer to the show’s closing, ostensibly to get a lower price from dealers eager for cash. Sound vulture-ish? Maybe, but talking cash always works for us- the buyer that starts to talk money is just that- a buyer. And this marks a pleasant change from the last couple of months, where no one was talking money.

Stay tuned for the show update.